I'm using a Creamware Pulsar II card (Pulsar software version 2.04a)with Logic Audio Platinum 4.6.1 on Windows ME, and the EASI drivers still don't seem to work properly (Ultra-high latency and now low volume throughput when compared to ASIO). It's not a drastically important issue since the ASIO drivers work fine ATM, but I'm just curious to know what advantage (or potential advantage) EASI has (or might have) over ASIO, if any. The Creamware manual gives the impression that EASI is a better solution to use with Logic, but that's not true on my system at the moment. It seems to me that (since LA v4.5) EASI is just being used as a way of talking to the Windows MME, but it seems a bit pointless to use this if you need low latency and your hardware is able to use ASIO drivers!
On the other hand, maybe I've misunderstood, and that EASI was never intended to compete with ASIO? Anyone know more about this?
Regards
Col
EASI vs ASIO? (by Col)
Subject: Latency w/EASI...
Interesting. I don't really use any VST instruments. I don't see a need to with all of the synths in Pular. I wonder if the VST instrument latency is somehow connected to the proprietary ASIO drivers, since they're both made by Steinberg?
Do you get the latency problems using Pulsar's synths in EASI?
Interesting. I don't really use any VST instruments. I don't see a need to with all of the synths in Pular. I wonder if the VST instrument latency is somehow connected to the proprietary ASIO drivers, since they're both made by Steinberg?
Do you get the latency problems using Pulsar's synths in EASI?