Page 1 of 1
Not impressed with wikipedia Creamware page
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:15 am
by sonicstrav
There is no Sonic Core page and the following article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creamware_ ... e_company)
IMHO it does the Scope Platform no favours.
I think we should chip in and edit this pile of junk.
Re: Not impressed with wikipedia Creamware page
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:19 am
by Mr Arkadin
Already cut out the crap at the end about native sounding as good as DSP - this is completely subjective and should noy be presented as fact. Let's see if i get a nasty note on my edit.
Re: Not impressed with wikipedia Creamware page
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:52 am
by w_ellis
It's a funny coincidence that you commented on that, as I spotted this page the other day and totally couldn't understand why there was even a section about Reaper. I'm settling into using it and I can't see anything that particularly distinguishing it from Cubase/Logic etc. on this point.
Either way, the page is really not that useful overall and could do with a rewrite. However, more importantly, there should be a good Sonic Core page put up too.
Re: Not impressed with wikipedia Creamware page
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:58 am
by siriusbliss
Any mention at all of Creamware should be dumped IMO.
G
Re: Not impressed with wikipedia Creamware page
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 12:02 pm
by netguyjoel
w_ellis wrote:there should be a good Sonic Core page put up too.
+1
The fact still remains, that Creamware really does not exist.
I am ALL FOR a Sonic Core page....IMHO that would be the most beneficial .....
Re: Not impressed with wikipedia Creamware page
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 12:43 pm
by sonicstrav
I have started one off - only wrote 2 lines though
