PlanetZ forums - scopeusers.com

Better than windows default process explorer, as you can see processes, sub-processes, cache use, etc etc...
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysi ... 96653.aspx

Really useful. I'm always checking viruses through process explorers and msinfo but this one seems to beat them all.

Merci Spacef.

HS: Je vais chercher ma nouvelle Mastercard ce Samedi. Bravo pour la mise à jour des mixers Qu'est ce qui merdait par curiosité?

Great! I was already looking for something like this, as i always thought the standard windows
process explorer was a bit unreliable ...

Very comprehensive. Where can I get a monitor to monitor this monitor?

normally it monitors itself already

Lol! It might be infected, like the mushrooms! Even if it is a sysinternal process

Too bad! I've been late on this one.

a super nice and really very light antivirus is Eset NOD32.
http://www.eset-nod32.fr/nod32_versions ... virus.html

Do you know if they make any win2003 server stuff?

Thanks in advance,

iSiStOy wrote:Do you know if they make any win2003 server stuff?

Thanks in advance,

For NOD32 ? i think so
btw, the site is in French

Configuration minimum
Processeur : Intel ou AMD x86/x64 - Systèmes compatibles : Microsoft Windows 2000, Microsoft Windows XP (32- et 64-bit), Microsoft Windows Vista (32- et 64-bit), Microsoft Windows Server 2000 (32- et 64-bit),
Microsoft Windows Server 2003 (32- et 64-bit), Microsoft Windows Server 2008 (32- et64-bit ) - Mémoire vive : 48 Mo - Espace disque (téléchargement) : 32 Mo - Espace disque (installation): 46 Mo

2003 R2 x86 here. Fine for me...
Encore merci

spacef wrote:btw, the site is in French

You mean, you accidentally posted the french site instead of the international one?

I havent used any anti-virus software on my machines for the last 5 years or so, but if anyone asks me to install something to keep virusses off their machine because they don't know how to behave on the web, and/or how to configure their machines to avoid getting infected in the first place, I give them AVG.

Yeah! Not applicable because of too much porn torrent sites navigation here !

PS: It's all about some french reputation to maintain...

I used avg but i really don't like it anymore (takes ages to start, wasn't good for me anymore...)...

I don't think AVG does Win Server 2003 though...
I mean... Freely!

If I have to pay 4 my web/sftp & other thing server, then I'll go to whichever company is able to demonstrate what it can do with it... And I'm not downloading porn with my dc win server 2003 by the way...

What's wrong with AVG? The only things I change on it are 1) schedule scans only monthly instead of daily, for office people and disable it completely for audio people, and 2) disable the signature it adds to your outgoing email by default.

"Chauviniste, nous? Nous français n'avons pas besoin de chauvinisme" ;p (Free after: "I don't need to be a chauvinist, I'm from Antwerp")

Hey at0m,

We've used AVG free for years always just making 'priority' updates, but they recently discontinued support for older versions & have basically forced users to install the new 8.5.xxx version which guess what... is either a piece of trash or doesn't like running on older computers like this P3 we use for the net. I'm still not sure what the story is, but it's seriously slowing down this machine. I'm thinking of ditching it if I can't get it running better. I bet the non-freeware version runs better.

Are you freely scanning via a server policy with AVG?

Completely off topic:
If french people can be taxed of chauvinism, then what about English people, American people, Chinese people, Canadian people or Netherlands people ?

Some little provocation by the way...

Apart from that At0m, i really like the roundup article you published in your signature.

I use eset nod32 on all my windows OS's here, can second it. If you multiboot you can use 1 license for the whole machine (except for virtual OS's which require an additional license). Version 2.7 is the 'light' version, version4 is the 'latest' version. I use v4 but 2.7 is a good match for someone who only wants the least amount of overhead or has an older PC (as in older than 6 years). I do NOT use the 'internet security' version, I'm not a fan of fully integrated suites (but this is going to change eventually as you won't be able to distinguish the two.)