Page 1 of 1
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 2:58 am
by evdb
anyone using this system ?? and......... are you a "satisfied customer" ??
some people would like to know
cheers
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 10:38 am
by ali
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 11:31 am
by erminardi
I've tested my system based to NF4 [see this tread:
http://www.planetz.com/forums/viewtopic ... orum=19&29 ]
with these benchmarks, Thonex & Fudd:[
http://www.adkproaudio.com/benchmarks.cfm ] and all seems to comply with the adkproaudio average result charts.
In Thonex test at 7ms all goes ok until the last track addition (some gliches appeared), howewer a good result. CPU usage 85%.
Fudd is a more heavy test: uses CPU around 90%-99% [task manager meter] another good result.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: erminardi on 2006-05-19 12:31 ]</font>
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 1:15 pm
by evdb
hi eminardi,
i thought you had a singlecore AMD, i/m confused now.
cheers
Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 1:02 am
by arela
Here are some "statesment" from the cubase forum, i trust jcschild has knowledge
http://forum.cubase.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=48738
Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 2:36 am
by erminardi
On 2006-05-19 14:15, evdb wrote:
hi eminardi,
i thought you had a singlecore AMD, i/m confused now.
cheers
Yes, but I'm talking about this "misterious" Nforce4 PCI incompatibility... in my system is all ok!
Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 5:14 am
by darkrezin
I didn't have good results with NF4, even with an RME Hammerfall DSP system, which is much less picky about hardware than Scope. I had lots of crackles, especially when using graphics-intensive functions (try moving windows around/minimizing/maximizing windows, switching between apps etc).
However I must add that this was an SLI board - non-SLI NF4 boards may be okay.
I still recommend Nforce3 and single-core for ultimate reliability and proven technology. I've used PCs for a long time, and IMHO it's better to have a stable, solid system than be on the bleeding edge of technology full of unknowns.