Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 1:00 am
by fra77x
Idea from clavia g2 manual. When a value is set by a consant value which passes through a control smoother when you change a preset (with a new value for the constant) then you 'll get a smooth trasposition.
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 1:27 am
by JLS
Sorry this post offtopic
im using MI+II+III+Flexor and G1MicroModular and G2Engine
My result G2engine
- better price (6dsp + MII+MIII+Flexor)
- more dsp power (pulsar 6dsp)
- all modules polyphonic
- more modulation and automation routing
- midi in out modulation function
- 4 independent slot
- separate dsp mono and poly area
- super bonus patch mutator
My pulsar best result
- Flexor
- SixString
- B2003
- Vectron
- MiniMax
- ProOne
- Lightwave
Final result G2 is better for modular and Pulsar better for synth emulation. I love both
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: megerov on 2006-02-23 01:30 ]</font>
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 1:59 am
by fra77x
Hi megerov, what do you think about the sound? Clavia's sound is very good. But i think scope is better. One extra thing is the ability to use scope fx in modular. (which are of very high quality).
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 9:26 am
by JLS
Compare is only for modular
My subjective think is - G2 better sound, soft and clear
Bad point G2 is:
- not included wavetable oscilator ( in new OS is possible )
- not included sample oscilator ( impossible implementation )
Good point G2 is:
- comb and phase filter, mod delay and string oscilator is ideal for psymod ( better than tube resonator and comb filter in MIII )
- i love granular sound patches
- all update OS with new modules and function is free
sorry my bad English
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: megerov on 2006-02-23 09:28 ]</font>
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:01 am
by fra77x
Well G2 is a wonderfull instrument with very nice sound, but nothing can beat modular in scope environment!
By the way a string oscillator for modular would be great as Clavia 's modular is better for PM for sure.