Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 12:14 pm
Hey,
I had a EMU e6400 sampler, which i never used, because its big, noisy and..
Anyway I am now going to use the STS5000 instead.. and i have downloaded a trial of CDXtract and are testing out diffrent convention. I find .SF2 more easy and clean to use, because of lesser files.
Is there any quality diffrents between SF2 and s/p files? It seems that the release seems more right on the sf2 file.. whats the peoples experiences?
rgs
I had a EMU e6400 sampler, which i never used, because its big, noisy and..
Anyway I am now going to use the STS5000 instead.. and i have downloaded a trial of CDXtract and are testing out diffrent convention. I find .SF2 more easy and clean to use, because of lesser files.
Is there any quality diffrents between SF2 and s/p files? It seems that the release seems more right on the sf2 file.. whats the peoples experiences?
rgs