Page 1 of 1

Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:17 pm
by irrelevance
Am I the only one still on service pack 1 for xp I wonder?

Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:40 pm
by garyb
i have machines on sp1 and sp2 and all are o.k.. there are some annoyances in sp2, but not functional ones....

Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2005 1:36 am
by Spirit
I have two daws now both running sp2. No problems. Where I did have trouble was connecting a laptop with SP2 onto a wireless network... had to go back to SP1.

Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:43 am
by valis
sp2 on 3 machines here...2 are used for audio (one does dual role as graphics/3d) and the 3rd is a 'net' box. All work great although I would say that I've done my fair share of tweaking (as I would to ANY O.S.)

Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:04 am
by irrelevance
So SFP runs smoothly under SP2 for you guys then?

Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2005 8:23 am
by bosone
i have not upgraded, and i have no intention to do so... everything runs smoothly and correctly, so why bother? :smile:

Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:11 am
by Kymeia
My new machine came with service pack 2 installed but it seems OK apart from the problem running oxe install files by double clicking. I've turned off a lot of the features though anyway as they were more to do with internet security and that PC is not and never will be on the net.

Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2005 11:13 am
by at0m
Haven't got nor need SP2 on my machines. Installed it on dad's office machine and didn't like it a bit. After installation of SP2, run over your tweaks again. If M$ keeps giving you pop-ups every 2 minutes about the terrible danger your machine is in when you don't have anti-virus or firewall on your offline DAW, disable some service - don't remember which, I don't have SP2 here.

Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2005 12:29 pm
by garyb
the antivirus popups seem to be confined to the first few minutes of operation then cease. yes, sp2 runs smoothly although i wouldn't recommend upgrading unless you are on the net which is something i don't encourage for a daw anyway.

Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2005 1:37 pm
by irrelevance
Yes I am toying with the idea of going online via a macintosh that I use for internet with brickhouse firewall which is pretty tight/secure. So I guess the pc would remain anonamous in that situation.

Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2005 8:48 pm
by symbiote
I'm still with SP1 also, haven't bothered with SP2 since my machine is rock-stable, and the new SP2 features are completely useless to me (don't use the built-in firewall, don't use IE, etc.) It's a networked machine too, I use it for everything (it's behind an OpenBSD box that handles firewall/NAT stuff) and works great.

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 5:16 am
by astroman
I agree with symbiote regarding network security - it's much easier (and probably more safe) to run an internet connection through a whatever designed router box.

I use a 40 Euro piece of hardware that even saves me from the connection software of my internet supplier (t-online), with the additional (unexpected) benefit that 'felt' connection speed is almost twice as high :eek:

cheers, Tom