Page 1 of 1

Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 5:58 am
by fra77x
Is there any relation to the behavior of delays... I have problem with tempo synced delays...

Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 3:36 pm
by at0m
Which problem where when?

Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2004 4:34 pm
by astroman
of corse there is a relation as both SpaceF and Warp69 include ULLI in their settings...

cheers, Tom

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 11:37 am
by Warp69
Hey,

Listen to Tom :smile:

There's a relation between the ULLI setting and the 256k delay module (all devices with more than 680ms delay are using that module).

Cheers

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 11:43 am
by Mehdi_T
exactly :smile:
Best
mehdi

Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 3:56 am
by fra77x
Most delays works right only at 25ms ulli...
bad thing

Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 4:21 am
by firubbi
what should be the best Ulli setting when you’re on recording? i can't set 4ms cause my processor is showing me 60/70% uses. 25ms is showing 2% cpu uses which is great but playing any a vst sampler is little unstable. What you guys do? (I’m on p4-1.4ghz and 1gb rd ram)


thanks