Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2003 5:28 am
by mythalethe
I used to do most of my mixing in Cubase, but have been playing around with bouncing out the cubase busses into SFP so I can use the (i think) better sounding EQ's and effects. Is this what most people do, and is it hard to automate the SFP 2448 mixer?
thanks,
Mythalethe
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2003 6:01 am
by hubird
in the end I bounce every track, specially the VSTi tracks, but I never automate the mixer (so far).
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2003 7:40 am
by krizrox
I do all my mixing in SFP also but I've been using tripleDAT for my recording program.
Just bought Sonar so no telling what I'll end up doing in the future. But I suppose I'll continue to do it the same way now that I can use ASIO as my interface to SFP.
I've never automated mixer functions.
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2003 12:49 pm
by garyb
i mox in xtc mode so i can use and automate sfp plugs in the logic mixer.i have automated the sfp mixer.you record the midi info in your sequencer.setting up the controllers is easy but time consuming.(there's a rumour that sfp will soon support mackie control)
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2003 3:03 pm
by marcuspocus
On 2003-11-06 12:49, garyb wrote:
there's a rumour that sfp will soon support mackie control
Man, i would LOVE that !

Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2003 6:27 pm
by mythalethe
Is Mackie control a standard, or does it just allow you to use that mackie hardware thing as a physical mixer interface?
(My Event EZBus allows tactile control of Cubase and I guess SFP too if I program in all the sliders...)
cheers,
Mythalethe
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2003 11:23 pm
by garyb
mackie control support makes the mackie control the physical surface for sfp mixers and plugs.
i'm hopefull....
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: garyb on 2003-11-06 23:24 ]</font>