Page 5 of 6
Re: Iran?
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:42 pm
by valis
Or at least enough to see an opposing view & set of interests (which IS useful imo.)
Re: Iran?
Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:03 pm
by Shroomz~>
Obama praise for Iran's Mousavi
Maybe someone can post a more credible source or a full version of the story.

Re: Iran?
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:29 am
by dawman
Obama's main objective while his popularity mesmorizes the sheep is to shove through his facist agenda while his popularity ratings are high.
Taking strong positions on issues like N.Korea or Iran would be a distraction to these fleecing policies.
Obama's advisors are extremely cautious and smart. They know the speeches are double talk and lies. We can't really change things in Iran unless we start arming the people w/ captured Russian weapons. That's why it's easier to be non commital and support whoever wins, typical rhetorical approach of a DC politician.
I do believe these guys who advise Obama were caught by surprise and now understand that Obama must be tough on N.Korea before they appear to be isolationalists with a yellow stripe on their backs.
Thankfully we have those tough UN Sanctions that say we can stop a N.Korean vessel, but we cannot board it..........??#$%^^^??
I can pretty much guarantee that the whole Micheal Jackson media frenzy is a good smoke screen for further distractions.
Obama will probably have lots of concerts of old burned out Motown singers and press opportunities to keep it alive while they pass these ridiculous fascist laws and dodge the N.Korean/Iranian dilemmas.
Hell they had the first faked string performance in history there for the innagural activities.
Everything about DC is a giant smoke screen and since the press is in their pockets just like millions of mesmorized Americans, these dances will continue.
The DC Press Corp is like a Ineternet developers forum, ask nice questions and you can stay, if you complain about bugs you are attacked or banned.
And people wonder why ancient relics like Helen Thomas have a front seat and gets to hang her jacket on " her chair " while she asks pre prepared questions.
The worst thing about wisdom is learning things you wished you wouldn't have known.
I was very interested on the Iranian issue or otherwise I would not have watched any cable news. I prefer selected DVD's and programs that actually entertain or educate me.
But just trying to follow that story I see 2 more " family values " politicians biting the dust because they had mistresses and used campaign funds to sneak off and practice even more lies.
Most of us live in a world of shit, and eat tainted popcorn as we watch the show....
Re: Iran?
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 6:09 am
by valis
XITE-1/4LIVE wrote:Taking strong positions on issues like N.Korea or Iran would be a distraction to these fleecing policies.
It would also set a bad precedent in that region if Iran was actually able to liberate itself via the people themselves. Consider how wrapped up we are in every other nation state bordering it. All of the media I see broadcast here gives the distinct impression if it wasn't for us the whole region would just devolve into chaos & medieval fiefdoms, you can't really support anything that stands as good evidence against that can you?
I do agree that the superstar deaths & controversies over extramarital affairs are making for a good dog & pony show, though it's one I'd rather not tune into.
Re: Iran?
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 6:19 am
by netguyjoel
+1
Re: Iran?
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 10:54 am
by dawman
Here's an example of how to bend any religion into a hateful justifiable way to kill your political rivals. I'm sure he had a vision where Allah came to him and spoke too.
I do like the microphone placements though.
The bigger the towel you wear, the more imprortant and closer to Allah I suppose, and the more mics w/ effects like IR's and reverbs to assist in the holier than thou effect.
I bet the soundman is scared to death if he gets feedback during one these speeches.
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&q=ira ... =777583169
Freak show.jpg
Re: Iran?
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:09 am
by netguyjoel
Te closer to Allah these guys get...It seems the further away they get from soap & water...

Re: Iran?
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:22 am
by dawman
Trust me, he looks like a commoner but lives in a luxurious lifestyle because Allah gave him permission.
I ask myself if he would refuse a lapdance......I don't think so.
These guys are no different than Jim Baker, Jimmy Swaggart, and Brigham Young.
Bringham Young.....................that's not even his real name.
Often after orgies fellow Mormans would say " Is there anything else we can do oh holiest of holies..?
He would then reply..." Just Bring 'em young."
Re: Iran?
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:44 am
by garyb
netguyjoel wrote:Te closer to Allah these guys get...It seems the further away they get from soap & water...

one of the main tenants in ALL the Semetic religions, Christianity, and especially Judaism and Islam is cleanliness and washing. it's true, goat herders who have no running water or electricity bath less frequently than city dwellers who have the same facilities as you do...
these people's rulers are crap, just like ours, that's no reason to just hate them.
Re: Iran?
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:55 am
by netguyjoel
It was a joke G...don't be cranky

Re: Iran?
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:09 pm
by dawman
I doubt the guy above was a goat herder.
He's acting tough to impress the holiest of his holies in hopes of being re-selected to a job no different than Ceasar's with the thumb up, thumb down down shit.
I respect all peoples and their chosen faiths, I just get confused by a world of hypocracy where killing in the name of God is O.K.
If one is so self consumed with hate, step up to the scrimmage line like a man, and say I want to kill these people, don't hide behind some absentee Lord or diety.
I am so tolerant of all faiths I often pray to Mohammed, Jesus, Johoveh, Budhha, Zues and many dieties when playing Black Jack. Why take a chance, one of them's bound to answer.
Re: Iran?
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:14 pm
by netguyjoel
Killing in the name of God.....so many religions have been guilty of it in history
How can one group (thousands of radicals be convinced to kill in the name of God), when I can't find two guys to help me move.

Just kidding...I'm pretty sure, if God wanted someone dead..it wouldn't be much of a problem...he has keys to the lightning cabinet.

Re: Iran?
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:51 pm
by garyb
+1
Re: Iran?
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:52 pm
by netguyjoel
Thanx G
I'm Catholic & the Crusades just blows my mind...all in the name of God...Jews, Muslims, Catholics,..the list goes on & on..
Re: Iran?
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:13 pm
by garyb
Re: Iran?
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:15 pm
by dawman
I heard the Clerics admired Micheal Jackson, which I found kind of strange, but then after seeing this picture, it made more sense.
akhund_kiss2.jpg
Re: Iran?
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:42 pm
by netguyjoel
wonder if he slipped him a little tongue..

Re: Iran?
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:50 pm
by dawman
Re: Iran?
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:32 pm
by netguyjoel
better......much better.....thanx for that one...

Re: Iran?
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:48 pm
by dawman
Here's a shot of Netunyahu and Akmahweenergobble discussing how to pretend they are going to kill each other so they can soak the USA for more cash.
It was Akmahweenargobble's first trip to the Wailing Wall.
towel 4.jpg
towel man.JPG