Page 34 of 51
Re: Nails in the Coffin
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:59 am
by FrancisHarmany
braincell wrote:I live in a beautiful neighborhood and my house is paid for and not underwater like yours is Jimmy. They said Vegas was recession proof. HAHA that was so wrong. I would buy a foreclosure house there as an investment except for the fact that they all all such cheaply made pieces of crap.
WOW! Your house is paid for! that settles it. Globalwarmin is a fact. Especially since Jimmy's house is now underwater. (its because the ice caps melted I assume).
yep...
he gots us by the ballzzzz
Re: Nails in the Coffin
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:16 pm
by dawman
braincell wrote:I live in a beautiful neighborhood and my house is paid for and not underwater like yours is Jimmy. They said Vegas was recession proof. HAHA that was so wrong. I would buy a foreclosure house there as an investment except for the fact that they all all such cheaply made pieces of crap.
The only reason your house is paid for is because it is on wheels....
The only ones underwater who were stupid enough to believe their all caring Government and take the low interest handouts with no money down.
You better be careful or a Tow Truck will come and take your house....
pilgrim-717574.jpg
Re: Nails in the Coffin
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:21 pm
by valis
C'mon Jimmy stop picking on the guy, government workers shouldn't have any problem paying off an average home mortage.
Re: Nails in the Coffin
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:47 pm
by garyb
Re: Nails in the Coffin
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:59 pm
by siriusbliss
Re: Nails in the Coffin
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:01 pm
by netguyjoel
the blind is still blind...
I would LOVE to see a picture of HIS house...the all mighty OZ/everlasting gob stopper/holier than thou/I know more than everyone else here...

Re: Nails in the Coffin
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:31 pm
by wayne
Normally quiet on this topic, the Chinese government has weighed in heavily -
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010 ... 842415.htm
There ya go!
Re: Nails in the Coffin
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:52 pm
by netguyjoel
Well....that settles it...
From a country that will not follow ANY guidllines, for curbing any emissions, ant not playing fair when it comes to the environment...
Yeah....they are the ones to be trusted now....
I trust them...don't you?...
As Dr. Evil would say.....RRRRRIIIIIGGGGGHHHHHTTTTT...

Re: Nails in the Coffin
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:55 pm
by garyb
yes, there's the word from one of the most credible, honest and humanity loving organizations in the world!
Copernicus' point of view was once pretty "fringe" itself....
Re: Nails in the Coffin
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:37 pm
by wayne
I forgot to say, braincell - i rent in a poor neighborhood. So there.
Re: Nails in the Coffin
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:13 am
by Zer
Re: Nails in the Coffin
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:27 am
by garyb
oh, well if normal people like those in the green line think that, then i will too!
mind control-it's not just for breakfast anymore....
Re: Nails in the Coffin
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:32 am
by garyb
i live in a scary neighborhood and have scarier mortgage. i'm not really worried, though.
oh, braincell, while you're in that beautiful neighborhood, watch out for irate marines!
government housing is usually nice and neat.
Re: Nails in the Coffin
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:22 pm
by Zer
Re: Nails in the Coffin
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 3:04 am
by Mr Arkadin
Nice to see a truly independent enquiry into the Climategate affair

:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/e ... 071751.ece
Re: Nails in the Coffin
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 10:49 am
by garyb
well, Lord Oxburgh thinks CO2 is a menace, especially if it makes him money. if it's good enough for his Lordship(what a putz), it's good enough for a nobody like me...

Re: Nails in the Coffin
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 11:27 pm
by dawman
The House Of Lords was only in Washington DC I thought.
Actually they should call themselves the House Of Gods, like Olympus.
It must be fun getting paid to break the rules that we must obey....

Re: Nails in the Coffin
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:12 am
by garyb
the earth would be nicer a little warmer. it's been so in the past. in any case, CO2 is not the problem. we now have PROOF of that. if it was, they wouldn't need to fake data.
Re: Nails in the Coffin
Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 5:32 am
by braincell
I agree 100% with the IPCC chair Rajendra Pachauri. The word "ignorance" was an excellent choice when talking about the garbage that climate change deniers spew. They are exactly like holocaust deniers.
From:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2 ... ersecution
In the Guardian article, Pachauri writes: "Thousands of scientists from across the world have worked diligently and in an objective and transparent manner to provide scientific evidence for action to meet the growing challenge of climate change. To obscure this reality through misplaced emphasis on an error in a nearly 3,000-page rigorous document would be unfortunate."
He adds: "Even more unfortunate is the effort of some in positions of power and responsibility to indict dedicated scientists as 'climate criminals'. I sincerely hope the world is not witnessing a new form of persecution of those who defy conventional ignorance and pay a terrible price for their scientifically valid beliefs."
Re: Nails in the Coffin
Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 7:03 am
by Mr Arkadin

Yeah, believe the word of a railway engineer (oh he's a professor all right: of business

) who has invented his own science 'facts' here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2 ... n-glaciers
Of course, you will no doubt say this is an isolated incident.

How many 'isolated' incidents does it take before they're no longer isolated. Oh that's right, more than one.
"In his Guardian interview, Pachauri defended the IPCC's use of so-called "grey literature" – sources outside peer-reviewed academic journals, such as reports from campaign groups, companies and student theses. The false Himalayan glacier claim came from a report by the green group WWF."
Yes nice to see the sources are from unbiased, thoroughly scientific sources. Jeez. How much more naive can you be?