Doesn't matter how you try to spin words, "quantic".
how many DSP for modular IV ?
Re: how many DSP for modular IV ?
To anyone who cares about this thread, "quantic" is wasting your time (and just a little of ours). This discussion has been had time & time again, on other forums as well as this one.
Doesn't matter how you try to spin words, "quantic".
Doesn't matter how you try to spin words, "quantic".
Re: how many DSP for modular IV ?
yeah, serious troll style.
he just wants to try to make others unhappy. not a musician, not an engineer, not even a real person, just a troll...
i remember when digidesign looking fellows tried to troll the old Creamware forum into destruction. that's part of how this forum came into being...
it doesn't matter what UAD is doing anyway. they aren't remotely a rival, at best they are complimentary products to Scope, or vice versa if people have problems with billing. UAD inside the sequencer inside Scope is just fine for mixdowns. a dBx 165, and an 1176 and a fairchild are all happy together in the same studio, why wouldn't the dsp cards be too?
he just wants to try to make others unhappy. not a musician, not an engineer, not even a real person, just a troll...
i remember when digidesign looking fellows tried to troll the old Creamware forum into destruction. that's part of how this forum came into being...
it doesn't matter what UAD is doing anyway. they aren't remotely a rival, at best they are complimentary products to Scope, or vice versa if people have problems with billing. UAD inside the sequencer inside Scope is just fine for mixdowns. a dBx 165, and an 1176 and a fairchild are all happy together in the same studio, why wouldn't the dsp cards be too?