PlanetZ forums - scopeusers.com

Did some1 tryed the MONO Vinco in a channel?

Mine is completely mute, and if a deactivate it, the sound go thru...

I was trying it on a guitar track, and the MONO Vinco is not working!!!!

Doh!

al bandy from love and marriage.

you mean Al Bundy from Married with Children don't you?

On 2002-06-19 23:34, King of Snake wrote:

al bandy from love and marriage.

you mean Al Bundy from Married with Children don't you?

yes, yes!! bundy, bundy! al bundy not "bandy"!! we have strange translate for this serial in croatia, but i remember franck sinatra's song "love and marriage, love and marriege.... !
if you listen better you can hear that sinatra's voice sounds like goes trough vinco. franck was totaly obssesed pulsar geek

i just tried the demo, and i thought it was great. i had decided to wait untill next mont/paycheck before i bought this one, but now im getting impatient.

earlier today i came up with the beginning (first verse and chorus) of a new song, so I recoded acoustic guitar and vox on the fly, paying no attention to the sound or my own performance.

when i now listened to it and tried vinco on it, i was very surprised. what i intended to be a simple sketch for further composing sounded now as a half decent production. half decent because the recorded material was of really poor quality and my playing/singing wasnt much to brag about either.

vinco gave the guitar an accented but controlled dynamic sound, and it still sounded crisp and alive. my poor excuse of singing/voice controll was a no brainer for vinco, it evened out the extreme varitions in level without draging my half hearted performance out of it. vinco even filled in the blanks in the lyrics.

So i guess you can say i liked it.

It doesent matter im gonna buy it anyway, but it would be interested if some1 compared it to other dsp compressors like bombfactory,waves, uad1, powercore etc.
Iv tried the renesaince comp from waves but only native. my first impression of vinco gives it the upperhand over that one.

my 2 cent, or should i say 168 euro.

thermos


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: thermos on 2002-06-20 14:25 ]</font>

Vinco Mono Fixed:
http://www.planetz.com/forums/viewtopic ... forum=10&0

Good, only trouble, is that now i've used the 'allowed' demo already, cannot try it again to see if it's fix correctly...

Maybe i'll wait a bit. But the first results i got (in the master channel insert) was pretty impressive IMHO...

Was just wondering if anyone with Vinco also has the Level Devil? If so, how do they compare?

So will SCOPE/SP users get a key for this, or will this be the first Creamware device we don't get?

good question subhuman! Vinco free to all Scope/Sp users sounds great to me

Why free only for Scope SP users?
If it's free, it has to be for every users. I don't own a Scope card but I've paid the same amount of money for my 3 Creamware's cards and plugins.

because they paid for the more expensive software, and creamware making this offer as an apoloige for the long wait update for scope users.
BUT hows it actually compare to UAD-1s?

this is not turning into one of them "CW should give everything away for free" arguments eh?

"free"!? this word don't exist in cw's dictionary - even for "big birthday"!
so, i'm waiting for my uad-1.
if i compare with cw's prices and devices what we have with basic configuration i can say that i got nice uad's compressors, eq, reverb.... for free!
_________________
<font size=-2>got my mojo working, but it just won't work on you</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: sandrob on 2002-06-22 09:30 ]</font>

Yes,and it works

Kim

On 2002-06-19 20:13, marcuspocus wrote:
Did some1 tryed the MONO Vinco in a channel?

Mine is completely mute, and if a deactivate it, the sound go thru...

I was trying it on a guitar track, and the MONO Vinco is not working!!!!

Doh!

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: kiminet on 2002-06-25 18:49 ]</font>

BTW, kiminet, between my first message and your, a Creamware patch was out, fixing it. Before, it didn't work in insert. That's exactly why a patch was release.

This at least show that creamware is fast at fixing things if they want to.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: marcuspocus on 2002-06-22 20:45 ]</font>

On 2002-06-22 20:44, marcuspocus wrote:
BTW, kiminet, between my first message and your, a Creamware patch was out, fixing it. Before, it didn't work in insert. That's exactly why a patch was release.

This at least show that creamware is fast at fixing things if they want to.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: marcuspocus on 2002-06-22 20:45 ]</font>

Money, the best motivation to be quick

I hope a bug fixed SFP 3.1x will come soon, even if there are too much bugs to be quick fixed as for the Vinco.

Have you seen the synths/samplerate bug? o

It is very nice: presets are changing with each samplerate!!! Try a preset at 48kHz and then at 96kHz...Some sweep effects speed and LFOs runs two time quicker at 96kHz compared to 48kHz, and the same issue goes proportionally at 32kHz & 44,1kHz, and this is the more obvious, I didn't analyse all the changes mades to the presets by changing the samplerate...:lol::lol:

I only hope the same issue doesn't affects FXs too (imagine a phaser that goes two times quickly at 96kHz than 48 kHz) :lol::lol:

Sound designers that mades the presets must be happy...They should now indicate at what samplerate they creates them, in order to be able to listen to the true one :lol::lol:

I know the subject of this post is Vinco, but I can't resist to say that I've checked some Creamware's effects too now at different samplerates.

This stupid bug also exist with the effects. Just be patients, they surely are working on it.

But from now, I refuse to give to Creamware a new credit line for debugging their softwares later. I'll don't buy Creamware's products until they'll proove that they works seriously on testing and debugging by releasing properly working softwares.

We users aren't supposed to be beta testers.

Dont be negative some1 will come up saying this is becuse u use pulsar in low quality!

Use 24 bit 96Khz so u'll get half of synth and half of fx compared to 44 khz 16 bit, and u'll realize u need more dsp and go buy the Scope SRB....

Truth or myth ?

ehehe

Please excuse me, but I don't understand your answer?