Page 2 of 2

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2002 4:39 am
by Zer
I still prefer SamplitudeĀ“s accoustic simulator together with the TC M3000 impulse responses, downloadable @ http://www.samplitude.de

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2002 11:49 am
by jupiter8
I have studied convolution quite thouroghly latley and can definitley say it can't be done on a Pulsar.
Believe me on this one. I wanted this more then anyone else.
Since it has no onboard memory, it will require enormous amounts of PCI resources.
It has enough DSP power but without the memory, basically your f....d.

I really love convolution.
It is a very simple yet elegant solution.
It is the reason i started to learn C++ programming.
You actually don't use FFT at all.
But that's all i am revealing at this point.


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: jupiter8 on 2002-06-06 12:55 ]</font>

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2002 1:15 pm
by subhuman
<i>Since it has no onboard memory, it will require enormous amounts of PCI resources. </i>

This is what I meant in my previous reply to this thread (only I was avoiding giving a more detailed explanation... :smile: )

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2002 10:24 pm
by jupiter8
Did'nt read the previous posts very thorough.

However i don't agree that it would be a very expensive plug(if it would be possible)
because it is really easy to program.

I'm even considering getting a Korg Oasys and try and make one for that.
They have released the SDK for free and the Oasys card has onboard memory.

Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2002 11:22 am
by subhuman
<i>However i don't agree that it would be a very expensive plug(if it would be possible)
because it is really easy to program. </i>

I was thinking along the lines of the <a href=http://www.sospubs.co.uk/sos/feb01/arti ... e.asp>Sony DRES777</a> - about $8,500.