PlanetZ forums - scopeusers.com

garyb wrote:anyone who can afford to multitrack at 192k has plenty of money to throw at the problem.
only mastering labs regularly use 192k.

so there will be no 192 khz for soniccore...
it seems that syncplate can handle 192 khz
but not scope.
why?????

I think because they are already working on 384 kHz...

hubird wrote:I think because they are already working on 384 kHz...

Are you living under a rock? I've been running at 768kHz for years with 0.001ms of latency...

I have a latency of minus 1 ms, can't get rid of it, now I'm forced to play too early in timescale!

scope work perfectly in slave mode at 96 khz with protools hd and adc latency compensation.
all guitard bass vocal and synth is modeling with scope plugins before recording in protools.
i use scope plugins on insert in protools.
when i made a mastering i use optimaster on insert in the master fader in protools.
i can use waves c4 multiband compressor for boosting protools track,but optimaster is enought for mastering.
also i use Scope asio for 4 stereo VST effect (send aux) in protools.(for reverbs and delay)
Boxpander seems to work perfectly with asio scope at 2 ms (128 samples)of latency...
protools HD + SCOPE + VST HOST (with asio scope) is probably the more flexible tools for using all format plugins at the best performance.
and all in th same 32 bit pc tower with a old q6600 quad and 4 gig of ram only.
digidesign for recording and midi some rtas intrument + tdm effect:2 cores
scope for pre recording mix and mastering .
bloxpander asio scope for 4 aux stereo vst effect.
more than enough for make music clean and rapidly.
phil