Page 2 of 6

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 2:55 pm
by zangsta
Gary, I wholeheartedly agree with what you just posted, it ties in with what I deem the most plausible scenario! The oil-men are conmen!

Jörgen

Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:30 am
by Nestor
I would like so much for it all to be a joke… the oil thing is really terrible

Thanks Gary for your explanation

Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:41 am
by braincell
Most oil, over 99% is produced by organisms in the ocean. I don't know what your agenda is Gary or why, but but you are side-stepping reality. None of the earth is on solid ground, it is floating on molten lava. It gets pushed up and pushed down. The tiny mountains where I live are 40 million years old and were once higher than mount everest.

Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:28 pm
by garyb
:lol:

ok, you know....but the truth is as it is. petroleum is mostly not organic.

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:27 am
by Immanuel
garyb wrote:btw-i rebuilt the injectors on the benz today, it runs better, quieter and smoother on old cooking oil than it does on deisel(kerosene)....
Some of the problems with bio fuel are however, that the particle outlet is much higher, and that the crops used is the cheap stuff, that poor hungry people might have a chance to afford to sustain life. Thus, bio fuel does increase starvation.

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:30 am
by Immanuel
Me$$iah wrote:All recent dicsoveries in the cancer field has pointed toward the idea that all cancers are caused by viruses
All is a very big number to throw out there. I've not heard about it, but even if it was so, then how can it not be smoking related, that smokers get this virus more than non-smokers?

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:17 am
by Zer
Image

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:09 pm
by zangsta
Discovery backs theory oil not 'fossil fuel'
New evidence supports premise that Earth produces endless supply
Posted: February 1, 2008
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2008 WorldNetDaily.com


A study published in Science Magazine today presents new evidence supporting the abiotic theory for the origin of oil, which asserts oil is a natural product the Earth generates constantly rather than a "fossil fuel" derived from decaying ancient forests and dead dinosaurs.

The lead scientist on the study – Giora Proskurowski of the School of Oceanography at the University of Washington in Seattle – says the hydrogen-rich fluids venting at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean in the Lost City Hydrothermal Field were produced by the abiotic synthesis of hydrocarbons in the mantle of the earth.

The abiotic theory of the origin of oil directly challenges the conventional scientific theory that hydrocarbons are organic in nature, created by the deterioration of biological material deposited millions of years ago in sedimentary rock and converted to hydrocarbons under intense heat and pressure.

While organic theorists have posited that the material required to produce hydrocarbons in sedimentary rock came from dinosaurs and ancient forests, more recent argument have suggested living organisms as small as plankton may have been the origin.
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59991

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:26 pm
by garyb
Immanuel wrote:
garyb wrote:btw-i rebuilt the injectors on the benz today, it runs better, quieter and smoother on old cooking oil than it does on deisel(kerosene)....
Some of the problems with bio fuel are however, that the particle outlet is much higher, and that the crops used is the cheap stuff, that poor hungry people might have a chance to afford to sustain life. Thus, bio fuel does increase starvation.
look, i'm just using used, waste cooking oil. the carbon released is part of the cycle already, so i can't even be faulted for that. i make the plants have air and they make oxygen in return, i'm in balance with nature and in harmony-except for the rest of the car.... :lol:

but i don't care about biofuel or any of the other little whiney mind traps that are set for me. i just like being independent of the filthy oil biz and fuel prices. i like that the car is straight-forward, well enginneered, fixable and mechanical, not electronic. using old oil from fryers is environmentally clean and my car runs better and quieter. whose food am i taking? the oil has already cooked dinner too many times.

the problem isn't really oil anyway. it's greedy wastefullness in the name of making money and power. if petroleum was handled by a system run by honest, responsible people and not the "profit motive", the impact on the environment would be minimal. the problem is the leadership and those that believe what these wicked leaders tell them.

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 4:15 am
by MD69
At least in France there is an endless source of old fried cooking oil lol

cheers

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:40 am
by garyb
who said petroleum is unlimited just because it's abiotic? EVERYTHING is limited. "peak oil" is a fraud however, and the petroleum supply is NOT the problem.

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:53 am
by garyb
MD69 wrote:At least in France there is an endless source of old fried cooking oil lol

cheers
:)

Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:08 am
by wayne
garyb wrote::lol:

ok, what's the use, i'll play with you.

CFR.
We have our own little one in Australia, it seems - Foreign Affairs Council, set up in '97 at the Howard government's outset, by the Howard government.

This administration "who embraced the buttocks of George W. Bush as if they were the bosoms of Dolly Parton" (Phillip Adams quote :) ) were only getting started then, but immediately appointed one Janet Albrechtsen to the council, as well as to the board of the ABC, our national broadcaster.

The ABC was known for it's (according to the "Right") "Left" leaning editorial policy - Janet was put there to try and curb this. She is a leading "opinion columnist" at The Australian, Murdoch's big paper here, and proudly states -

"She is roundly disliked by judicial activists, the human rights industry, old-style feminists and assorted rent-seekers.

None of that troubles her." - She's a lawyer-turned-journo.

The Australian became quite a sickening thing during the Howard years, and they now have only one "Left" opinion/blogger, the aforementioned Phillip Adams, who is a namedropping, pompous, self important but good-hearted old fella, seemingly kept there to inflame the "Right" readers.

Lately there is a lot of hate blogging to do with the national apology to indigenous people that will happen tomorrow.

For those that don't know, this may or may not be the first step to some sort of reconciliation with Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander peoples - time and action will tell - but I know first hand that it is the necessary first step.

I'll never forget the punk busker and bandleader in Adelaide, circa 1981, Alph Omega - singing his tune "Murdoch's Gutter Rag" in Rundle Mall, when the evil Rupes ran The News, Adelaide's rubbish bus-trip tabloid.

I used to be able to make a post on The Australian's "Your Say" blogs, but since mentioning CFR in a reply to one of Janet's twisted pieces, none of my posts are published (starting with that one).

Let's get feisty, folks. Fight the power. No, not that one! :)

Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:55 am
by dawman
Censorship Sucks.

The Z is a true freedom forum.

NS Forums censor your replies, and are way over moderated.

Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:15 am
by siriusbliss
Change is re-arranging deck-chairs on the TItanic.
We need wholesale transformation.

I feel like I'm living in the dark ages forced to watch some bad movie with bad actors and brainwashed participants.

I want my country (and planet) back.

Greg

Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:37 pm
by siriusbliss
stardust wrote:as you say.....change happens...Obama is ahead of Clinton
Therefore he will only rearrange the deck chairs.
Will still want to bomb Pakistan.
Is still a shill for his 'keepers'.

Therefore, nothing will change. It will just APPEAR that there is no iceberg ahead.

G

Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:18 pm
by garyb
obama and clinton are both members of the CFR, therefore they both are part of the same agenda.

Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:44 pm
by Zer
who cares...It´s still not clear who killed jfk or is it?

But from a german view an americon visit of the french sarkokozy / bruni by the clintons would be some kind of comic.

And a German president "Putin" (hrhr) like stated from a guy really called (MC)Cain...that must be some kind of real blaspheme which will lead into an enormous amount of religious jokes and satire (certainly in the world except from the us). Well, it is really hard to be a satirist those days...you simply can`t match the reality.

Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:09 pm
by garyb
yes, it's quite clear who killed jfk.

E. Howard Hunt confessed the whole operation to his son before he died, both in his own handwriting and on tape.

the CIA and Mafia have already officially admitted their part.

LBJ's mistress went on record about LBJ's bragging about doing in Kennedy.

LBJ's personal documents admitting complicity in the murder have been released.


CFR is a part of the Royal Council on Foreign Affairs. McCain and Dick Cheney(who was the president) are members. it was set up by the Rockefellors who work for the Rothchilds(who control ALL the money, oil, gold, silver, coal, copper, etc for the world including the "wold bank"). it is a Daughter organization to Bilderburg and Club of Rome. wold government is real, it's here, and it's a lie as are all these political operations and organizations and the foolish notion of satire(although i really DO like a good joke!)....

Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:27 pm
by hubird
I've read Bea pulled the trigger...