Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 6:33 pm
?
If you do those, I'll do the Anglo-Saxon, Norse and Celtic versions.On 2006-10-19 15:08, katano wrote:
wär' dir sächsisch, altsächsisch, mittelniederdeutsch oder niedersächsisch lieber?
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: katano on 2006-10-19 15:15 ]</font>
ich kann multi-dialektwär' dir sächsisch, altsächsisch, mittelniederdeutsch oder niedersächsisch lieber?
Hi,MCCYRANO wrote:Hi!
No bugs, no problems concerning the sound/the aim of the plug reported. No phase-issues, no strange sounds, no unwanted/unexpected clipping or anything... Now could be the time to correct it. O.K. I didn't find anything like that either so far
Martin
Problem is: no time here at the moment. have a lot of plugs in my test queue, and not only plugs from you... sorry...MCCYRANO wrote:Hi!
I thought I would get more feedback this way.
Seems kylie is the only one who intensively tested MOVEQ+ and it's abilities and weak points (which will be corrected in case where they were reproducable and problematic for usage in any way). Thanks for your PM-input..
No comments on abilities of MOVamily, which disappoints me a bit! No freaky usage of MIDI-4-kick which is in my opinion absolutely revolutionary.. No other ideas for MOVamily? Hm. I'm just wondering...
Martin
and I mainly concentrated on the gui and not really on what it sounds like...MCCYRANO wrote: Seems kylie is the only one who intensively tested MOVEQ+ and it's abilities and weak points
I like the lfo much. it's selfexplaining capabilities are sufficient even for meNo freaky usage of MIDI-4-kick which is in my opinion absolutely revolutionary.. No other ideas for MOVamily? Hm. I'm just wondering...
hallelujah. we've been heard. count on me. but care for the split-button spikes...There was a question concerning the price: Our aim is 30€
This may have various reasons. It may be, that you have a high input and distort the first EQ- module in the 2EQ-groups. So you'd better lower your input a bit. I think it's nice in MOVEQ+, that you can correct gain after every 2 EQs. That should be enough. B.t.w. Wolf has made a GREAT solution on monitoring after EVERY EQ in his EQ. Superb work! I b.t.w. like wolfs devices very much. Just pure clear information about what they do and what you will get for the price.Like Kylie,i have tested MOVEQ+ because i need a dynamic eq ,but, there are phase problems on this one,anyway ,you can't make differently when you vary a frequency and a Q.
Another problem, i'm using Wavelab 4 with asio 24 and i can hear distorded sound at -3 db on a mix.Is this desired ?
Thanks for your feedback. I hoped that you'd be more detailed on pointing out that phase problems you mentioned in another thread. It's O.K. if you prefer another EQ over MOVEQ+ if MOVEQ+ does not what you want.like Hifiboom , i prepare some test wich i'll upload on my website.
Concerning the price,sometimes,it's better to pay expensive to have quality.
I find the design very nice but it's not enough for me.(i find it more beautiful than Dynpara M/S ).
But i could pay 30 euros to support devellopers !
Interesting. I say no EQ device is perfect concerning phase (I've heard none on scope. Every device which changes sound changes phase in a way.), but I can say that MOVEQ+ does not have any phase imperfectness compared to all other EQs on this platform. You talk about "problems" so you may think of something else, which would be nice to be described further.Anyway ,you can't make differently when you vary a frequency and a Q.