Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 11:47 am
by spiderman
yes completly agree !!
is someone could do a test like this :
record a external source from AD to vdat and to samplitude or the crappy cubase , in 24bit. and then import the 24bit file from the native stuff on a next track into the vdat .
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 5:16 pm
by Kymeia
So to come back to the OP - it sounds like VDAT is the best option if I want to record the sound and stay in Scope. I assume as it's a device I can place it anywhere in the signal path to record dry and wet signals - is there a limitation on how many copies I can load at a time?
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 5:48 pm
by geoffd99
There is dithering to consider when changing bit rate, this adds a random element at a low level. Etc...
>>> from one of my old posts >>>
There is a discussion of DAW quality, based around a test cd, here:
http://www.mercenary.com/3dauawdawsum.html
Also a discussion forum
http://www.3daudioinc.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 6:26 pm
by astroman
On 2005-04-11 18:16, Kymeia wrote:
... is there a limitation on how many copies I can load at a time?
obviously you haven't noticed the VDAT chapter in the SFP documentation (under Studio) yet
up to 128 tracks controlled in groups of 8 tracks on 1-16 modules.
cheers, Tom
ps: there's no better recording than VDAT possible on SFP because it saves exactly what's moved between the DSPs