Recording stuff revisited

A place to talk about whatever Scope music/gear related stuff you want.

Moderators: valis, garyb

spiderman
Posts: 189
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: the web indeed !!

Post by spiderman »

yes completly agree !!

is someone could do a test like this :

record a external source from AD to vdat and to samplitude or the crappy cubase , in 24bit. and then import the 24bit file from the native stuff on a next track into the vdat .
Kymeia
Posts: 492
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:00 pm

Post by Kymeia »

So to come back to the OP - it sounds like VDAT is the best option if I want to record the sound and stay in Scope. I assume as it's a device I can place it anywhere in the signal path to record dry and wet signals - is there a limitation on how many copies I can load at a time?
geoffd99
Posts: 400
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: South London

Post by geoffd99 »

There is dithering to consider when changing bit rate, this adds a random element at a low level. Etc...
>>> from one of my old posts >>>
There is a discussion of DAW quality, based around a test cd, here:

http://www.mercenary.com/3dauawdawsum.html

Also a discussion forum

http://www.3daudioinc.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8452
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by astroman »

On 2005-04-11 18:16, Kymeia wrote:
... is there a limitation on how many copies I can load at a time?
obviously you haven't noticed the VDAT chapter in the SFP documentation (under Studio) yet :wink:

up to 128 tracks controlled in groups of 8 tracks on 1-16 modules.

cheers, Tom
ps: there's no better recording than VDAT possible on SFP because it saves exactly what's moved between the DSPs
Post Reply