PlanetZ forums - scopeusers.com

I'm using 1280x1024 and the entire length of the mixer channels just fits from end to end on my 17" screen. I keep the master channel window underneath and a bit lower than the mixer section so I can click on that window and bring it forward when I need to.

I agree it's clunky.

And I still notice problems with the EQ section. When I pull up different EQ types (like low pass for example), the curve sometimes disappears. There is really somthing wrong with the EQ section. Anyone else seen that problem?

bassdude,

You can change your font and text size to what ever is comfrotable to you. At the resolutions that I run, I generally set them to about 140%.

Also where did you get these recommended sizes from? I'm just curious, because my Viewsonic 21" has a recommended size of 1600 x 1200.

I could change the font size but then that is at the expense of screen real estate anyway so I don't bother. I'm pretty happy with the res as is because it's comfortable for me and I can still read the screen from a distance.

The recommended resolution is for my monitors which were originally used for unix workstations. The CDE desktop resolution was set to 1280 x 1024.



<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: bassdude on 2004-05-22 19:05 ]</font>

I'm on 19" and I'm sort of undecided between 1280 x 1024 (or 1280x960) and 1600x1200. I like the screenspace the latter gives but it gets a bit too small at times for things that don't have adjustable font sizes, so 1280x1024 is really better suited to a 19". With a 21" I would definitely go for 1600x1200 though.

I use my 22" hitachi (crt) at 1600x1200 and can't complain about anything other than deskspace and power consumption.