SC SL9000 issue

An area for people to discuss Scope related problems, issues, etc.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
Ditykman
Posts: 98
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 5:08 am

SC SL9000 issue

Post by Ditykman »

Hello all
how are you?
This morning I want to use the SL 9000 all is ok but after the reload of the project the eq part of the SC SL9000 et blocked in the mediums and I can't change anything in the eq part?
The SL9000 doesn't work?

Thanks
User avatar
Marco
Posts: 1260
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:27 pm
Location: Ödenwald

Re: SC SL9000 issue

Post by Marco »

Sometimes scope saves shit, then it cant be reloaded. I make versions when I make changes, if something goes wrong I can reload.

Ich spreche lieber deutsch wenn du willst. :D
:wink: out and about for music production. Are you still configguring your Studio :lol: music first!
djmicron
Posts: 1181
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Milano

Re: SC SL9000 issue

Post by djmicron »

does it work if you load it in a new project?
Ditykman
Posts: 98
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 5:08 am

Re: SC SL9000 issue

Post by Ditykman »

I will try this tonight
thanks for the answer
If for you it works I will find how
dawman
Posts: 14368
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: PROJECT WINDOW

Re: SC SL9000 issue

Post by dawman »

There's also a nice way to save settings for recall in a project that seems to help me.
It works on MIDI Channel 1 and can save snapshots/presets that are really helpful.
Those who can't get Solo/Mute functions the way they like on the STM mixers can save presets using this. Same with AUXs, Insert FX, etc.

http://forums.planetz.com/download/file.php?id=2229
Yogimeister
Posts: 323
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:12 am

Re: SC SL9000 issue

Post by Yogimeister »

Same thing is happening to me also ...

I am using it in a project with two 1632 mixers ...

On both mixers the plug loades with a peak in the midrange and the EQ is not responsive ...
Also, I cant load any saved presets (when loading a fresh new instance - which eqs i CAN control) ....


What I've found out so far is that if I place the Sl9000 in the project as a device outside the mixer - the project loads with the saved setting and everything works - but i still cant seem to load presets (including the factory "default" setting ....)

Havent tested this on other mixers yet ....

(Its not a matter of a corrupted project file ....)

Any thoughts/tips ?
User avatar
dante
Posts: 5040
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia
Contact:

Re: SC SL9000 issue

Post by dante »

You could try the updated DAS version:

http://forums.planetz.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=30531
Yogimeister
Posts: 323
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:12 am

Re: SC SL9000 issue

Post by Yogimeister »

I guess that's only if I buy it ... Right ?

How is it compared to DAS's SL9000 ?
User avatar
dante
Posts: 5040
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia
Contact:

Re: SC SL9000 issue

Post by dante »

Way more instances on XITE - needs Scope 5.x. Ask S|C for a demo if you want to try without buy. Compared to SC version ? A better filter algo.

On XITE-1D I loaded 32 of them into a DAS mixer - as inserts.

http://forums.planetz.com/viewtopic.php ... 0L#p284726
Yogimeister
Posts: 323
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:12 am

Re: SC SL9000 issue

Post by Yogimeister »

Well ... I am running old PCIs - so thats not my main consideration ....

The C350 seems amazing - but it is not at the top of my purchase list ... (Saving up for their compressors .... not to mention the ADERN stuff ....)
Plus - I am still at the Scope-noob stage where I am excited about and loving the regular SL9000 - and the other 5.1 plugs ...

But I am drooling over some of the plugs/synths (&FLEXOR) out there ... Crossing my fingers for some sort of sale soon ...
User avatar
dante
Posts: 5040
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia
Contact:

Re: SC SL9000 issue

Post by dante »

Yogimeister wrote:The C350 seems amazing -
The C350L even better.
Yogimeister
Posts: 323
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:12 am

Re: SC SL9000 issue

Post by Yogimeister »

Is it better sonically or just in regards to Xite compatibility/integration ?
(Will I get the DSP benifits on PCI cards ?)
User avatar
dante
Posts: 5040
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia
Contact:

Re: SC SL9000 issue

Post by dante »

Sonically is subjective. But to my ears, the set of devices that use the DAS custom filter algo (DASCOEFF) sound better than devices based on standard Scope filter atoms - on both PCI and XITE.

Haven't tested C350L instance count on PCI.
Yogimeister
Posts: 323
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:12 am

Re: SC SL9000 issue

Post by Yogimeister »

Do the DAS SL9000 (v1 or v2) have that algorithm ?
(I couldnt find an in depth description on the web / SC / Hitfoundry)

(And since we already sortof hijacked this thread - do you know what is the technical difference between v1 and v2 ?)

Thanks
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23246
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Re: SC SL9000 issue

Post by garyb »

the SC SL9000 was made by DAS. that's my understanding anyway.
User avatar
dante
Posts: 5040
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia
Contact:

Re: SC SL9000 issue

Post by dante »

It's a long time ago since I had these conversations with Eric from DAS so anything I say stands to be corrected - but from memory - the SC SL9000 was made before DAS invented their own Filter algorithm. When DAS built the improved filter code they then used it to make C350, MasterIT and Legend EQ. This is why C350 sells for a price and is considered an upgrade from the SL9000. This algo was also requested by Brainworx when DAS were doing the BX Digital port (but not used) so I guess Brainworx also liked it.

After XITE-1D came out I tested all DAS plugs that I had on it - as DAS didn't have the D version - anyway during that time Eric found a way to optimize C350 and kindly released it as the C350L as a free upgrade (for C350 owners) and came in a new gold colour scheme and calibration tweaks on some of the parameter knobs.

That's all I know or remember - for accuracy or more detail you would need to check with DAS.

They did however put considerable effort into providing - free- a few XITE freebies, optimizations and advice for customers transitions to the XITE platform.
Last edited by dante on Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23246
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Re: SC SL9000 issue

Post by garyb »

thanks Dante.
Post Reply