How much does the Creamware a16 NON ultra suck?

A place to talk about whatever Scope music/gear related stuff you want.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
User avatar
the19thbear
Posts: 1403
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

How much does the Creamware a16 NON ultra suck?

Post by the19thbear »

Hi! It's been years since i have posted here. Great to see that the forum is still alive an kicking. Hope all of you are doing great:)

I got my hands on a creamware A16 NON ultra.
How bad is it? I cant really find any reviews etc only, because this thing pretty much predates the internet;)

I could buy the behringer ultragain 8200, but then I have to get new cables etc, and I would rather save the money.
I'm sure this convert is pretty bad. Pro-sumer stuff from the late 90s.. but well.... any first hand experiences? Reviews etc?

Thanks:)
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23248
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Re: How much does the Creamware a16 NON ultra suck?

Post by garyb »

the converter sounds very good.
it's "only" 18bit, though. it also does not like a unbalanced cable in the balanced i/o.

really, it's a good-sounding device. you may or may not like it better than the 8200, it is probably a bit smoother sounding than the 8200, but the 8200 is more useful.

some of the best sounding AD/DA converters ever made were some of the original 1bit DSD converters, but that type of converter is sooo expensive compared to current crop of 24+bit devices, that they are impractical. also, there is a lot of controversy about which is better, PCM or DSD. PCM is much, much, cheaper and so it is the standard. PCM certainly offers lower distortion, but a good many people prefer DSD, thinking it sounds more like analog circuits. the point of all this is that these things are pretty subjective.

unless you are recording classical instruments playing very dynamic material, the old A16 should be ok. just beware of shorting out the outputs with unbalanced plugs. you should make some patch cables with the shield lifted on one end.
User avatar
the19thbear
Posts: 1403
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Re: How much does the Creamware a16 NON ultra suck?

Post by the19thbear »

Cool Gary, thanks:)
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8406
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Re: How much does the Creamware a16 NON ultra suck?

Post by astroman »

The converters and the digital filter set are among my favourites - it digitizes 18 physical bits, but uses only the high 16 bits, so the result is much better than a regular 16bit converter. The lower 2 bits are always uncertain by nature.
But the unit may suffer from heat wear over the years, so check the channels.
The internal regulation does NOT like some types of cheap switching PSUs (in case someone replaced the original adapter by such a thing) - it gets way too hot. I run mine on a classic Thinkpad PSU (original IBM), which keeps the A16's regulation less engaged, so the box stays much cooler.
User avatar
Bud Weiser
Posts: 2684
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:29 am
Location: nowhere land

Re: How much does the Creamware a16 NON ultra suck?

Post by Bud Weiser »

astroman wrote: Sun Oct 07, 2018 3:54 pm
The internal regulation does NOT like some types of cheap switching PSUs (in case someone replaced the original adapter by such a thing) - it gets way too hot. I run mine on a classic Thinkpad PSU (original IBM), which keeps the A16's regulation less engaged, so the box stays much cooler.
Does that rule for the A16 Ultra too, or are these different design in regards of (switching) PSU regulation ?

:)

Bud
User avatar
Marco
Posts: 1260
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:27 pm
Location: Ödenwald

Re: How much does the Creamware a16 NON ultra suck?

Post by Marco »

:D the A16 is the much better one in contrast to the stupid behringer, because I always lost sync and I hat many crackles. At last I sold the behringer shit! Today I went back to the end of the 90ties and got the the original A16 with scope and a perfect Sound!

So if you want it for scope, then use the a 16 non ultra for best 16 bit sound, really really good enough for my homerecording and for my mixing skills.
:wink: out and about for music production. Are you still configguring your Studio :lol: music first!
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8406
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Re: How much does the Creamware a16 NON ultra suck?

Post by astroman »

Bud Weiser wrote: Mon Oct 08, 2018 1:43 am
Does that rule for the A16 Ultra too, or are these different design in regards of (switching) PSU regulation ?
Both units are likely to be very (!) different in design, but I never had an Ultra myself.
The original A16 has a very unique regulation layout - I don't have any clues about how it works.
Someone more knowledgeable explained it here years ago iirc.

As mentioned it doesn't apply to switching PSUs in general, but to certain budget types. Heard about the heat issue by a fellow in need for a replacement PSU who had just tried a 'matching' cheapo.
Repeated his 'test' and within 5 minutes you literally could fry eggs on the box. :o

While I was at it I picked my Thinkpad A21's PSU which delivers slightly less voltage and it worked great.
Made a couple of recordings with both the original and the IBM and couldn't tell any difference or flaws in sound.
So I sent off my PSU as a replacement to him and used the notebook one from then on. The A21 was more or less a geek purchase anyway (1600x1200 screen, orginally almost 10 grands... ) iirc It cost me 100 bucks or so :D
User avatar
Bud Weiser
Posts: 2684
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:29 am
Location: nowhere land

Re: How much does the Creamware a16 NON ultra suck?

Post by Bud Weiser »

astroman wrote: Mon Oct 08, 2018 4:05 pm ... I never had an Ultra myself.
O.k., thx for reply.
astroman wrote: Mon Oct 08, 2018 4:05 pm The A21 was more or less a geek purchase anyway (1600x1200 screen, orginally almost 10 grands... ) iirc It cost me 100 bucks or so :D
Well ... Pentium III,- IIRC ...

:)

Bud
User avatar
valis
Posts: 7306
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: West Coast USA
Contact:

Re: How much does the Creamware a16 NON ultra suck?

Post by valis »

I believe the a16 non-ultra was 18bit not 16bit? As in the spec of the physical converters was 18bits, which is really all you can get until you hit thermal noisefloor anyway, regardless of how well spec'd and modern any converter is. Ie, if you record to 24bits from an 18bit, 20bit or 24bit converter, the result is pretty much the same. How much resolution do you need for your noisefloor after all?

Now where things do differ is in peak performance attributes and how well overages are dealt with, both on the AD side and on the DA side.
User avatar
the19thbear
Posts: 1403
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Re: How much does the Creamware a16 NON ultra suck?

Post by the19thbear »

Thanks everyone. I ended up getting the behringer 8200.
User avatar
t_tangent
Posts: 970
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: UK

Re: How much does the Creamware a16 NON ultra suck?

Post by t_tangent »

In which case you might be interested in the following

https://www.blacklionaudio.com/store/mo ... r-ada8200/

I believe a few users on this forum have spoken great things about their mods, so perhaps they can comment. But just figured you might find this of interest.
Felipeh
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2021 4:02 am

Re: How much does the Creamware a16 NON ultra suck?

Post by Felipeh »

Hi guys. I know this thread is old now. But if anyone reads this and can help me I would be forever grateful.

I just received an A16 unit and I seem to have everything except the outputs working. I have balanced cables and as soon as I plug them into the unit it starts flashing and turns off.

I am using windows 10 with an RME HDSPe Raydat card...

Any help in getting me to understand how this works would be appreciated.
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8406
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Re: How much does the Creamware a16 NON ultra suck?

Post by astroman »

As GaryB mentioned above: the unit doesn‘t like unbalanced cables... to the degree that the output drivers may be fried.
There‘s a warning in the manual, but nothing printed to the back of the A16.
Chances are someone used it with wrong cables, but also that he or she didn‘t use all outputs.
So you may use a single balanced connection to try which outputs fail.

best of luck, Tom
Post Reply