Would the Xite projects be the same as my Pulsar 2 projects pretty much? - Being 'SFP' (Scope Fusion Platform) I would have thought so but correct me if my assumption isn't accurate.....
Rock stable on XP32 here - running PCI on same host.
'Incomplete Load Balancing' could mean sat connections can run out before DSP does, so you dont get to 100% on DSP meter (that could be fixed if they included SAT% on the meter as well IHMO).
Even so, in one of my first tests I got 35 voice polyphony across 9 different synths, and a mixer running and thats just on the XITE-1D smaller version (only 4 big DSP instead of 12).
I find XITE is best loaded when you use a diverse mixture of different devices, and Ralf once told me same thing.
yeah, people complain about the limits as though the performance is BAD for the money they spend. yes, it can and will get better, but just think, for the price of two 15 dsp cards, an XITE-1 gives the perfomance of a minimum of six 15 dsp cards, and maybe eight or nine depending on what is loaded...what a terrible performance...
Agreed. Thats why I think the DSP meter kinda sucks at the mo, coz if it showed SAT connections maxing out at 98% whilst DSP was still only at 60%, people would go "wow I'm utilising the full XITE power now - fantastic !"
).
