I think that 'blank space' is actually the ribbon controller. The placement in the mock-up is a bit awkward, but a ribbon would be a most welcome performance control, especially if it accurately emulates the behavior of the CS-80 ribbon.Mr Arkadin wrote:I think that blank panel would need some filling up.
Nice idea, but the ASBs don't seem to be designed to emulate any controllers - the Prodyssey doesn't have PPC (which are very distinctive sounding compared to wheels). The Minimax and Pro-12 had standard wheels so most controllers would have those. i think they would expect the user to have a ribbon controller (i have a Kurzweil Expressionmate that i use to emulate the PPC for instance).gregae wrote:
I think that 'blank space' is actually the ribbon controller. The placement in the mock-up is a bit awkward, but a ribbon would be a most welcome performance control, especially if it accurately emulates the behavior of the CS-80 ribbon.
How about if it was built like the system 1200...gregae wrote:I think that 'blank space' is actually the ribbon controller. The placement in the mock-up is a bit awkward, but a ribbon would be a most welcome performance control, especially if it accurately emulates the behavior of the CS-80 ribbon.Mr Arkadin wrote:I think that blank panel would need some filling up.
Not so true.......remember the drawbars on the b4000 asb...Mr Arkadin wrote:Nice idea, but the ASBs don't seem to be designed to emulate any controllers - the Prodyssey doesn't have PPC (which are very distinctive sounding compared to wheels). The Minimax and Pro-12 had standard wheels so most controllers would have those. i think they would expect the user to have a ribbon controller (i have a Kurzweil Expressionmate that i use to emulate the PPC for instance).gregae wrote:
I think that 'blank space' is actually the ribbon controller. The placement in the mock-up is a bit awkward, but a ribbon would be a most welcome performance control, especially if it accurately emulates the behavior of the CS-80 ribbon.
or a system 3000?slammah2012 wrote:
How about if it was built like the system 1200...
Well they're the sound generating controls, like an Osc knob on a synth. Yes they can be used as performance controllers, but they're not in themself performance controllers as such. The B4000 without drawbars would just be a Klangboxslammah2012 wrote: Not so true.......remember the drawbars on the b4000 asb...
The B4000 has 9 drawbars...... which are controllers independent of master preset.....Switchable between upper and lower on 2 midi channels or 1 with a split point...
.That thing looks like a home-built construction by someone who has some wood-working skills. It's nice, but it's too bad they got cheap and used plywood for the ends instead of using solid wood. And even if solid wood wasn't available, applying a bit of veneer would cover up the exposed edges.piddi wrote:or a system 3000?slammah2012 wrote:
How about if it was built like the system 1200...
http://www.sequencer.de/pix/creamware/c ... em3000.jpg
Here are some Photos of My CS80, and my Prodyssey.....just to show you sises of the original 4 memory panels....gregae wrote:That thing looks like a home-built construction by someone who has some wood-working skills. It's nice, but it's too bad they got cheap and used plywood for the ends instead of using solid wood. And even if solid wood wasn't available, applying a bit of veneer would cover up the exposed edges.piddi wrote:or a system 3000?slammah2012 wrote:
How about if it was built like the system 1200...
http://www.sequencer.de/pix/creamware/c ... em3000.jpg
I'd give 'em an 'A' for the effort, though.
Is this one better???slammah2012 wrote:Just a general question....
Who would be interested in the development of an
ASB-CS-8000
(yamaha CS80)
***** plese note this image is just a fake rendering and is only a hypothetical question***** and I apologize to anyone taking offence.
***** plese note this image is just a fake rendering and is only a hypothetical question***** and I apologize to anyone taking offence.
