maybe that's true, but i'd say there's more going on than you can see through your infallible news sources.
Trump is a lot of things, including a guy who probably shouldn't even be in the race, but the polls are not accurate, and he is correct. the elections are rigged, at least to a moderate level. this isn't new, American politics have been full of nonsense from various sources since at least the late 1800's. there have been many scandals, including wholke states where votesd were acknowledged as manipulated. Chicago's Tammany Hall is one of the most famous examples of organized crime in politics. Chicago's politics are still affected by the organizations set up then.
i don't necessarily believe that just because the elections are rigged that those who do the rigging always get their way, there are many forces at work. it has been demonstrated over and over, however, that the electronic voting machines can be, and are easily hacked. it's crazy stuff, like machines on the internet with NO firewall protection, or protected passwords.
just face it. this whole election is just two wholly unacceptable clowns fighting for your entertainment. i'm glad you're enjoying this hubird. since Hillary has had numerous meetings with your queen and other Bilderbergers. we already know that she's selected from the beginning, which is why Trump was chosen to run against her. wanna know something even funnier? in all UNOFFICIAL polls, women are choosing Trump 10 to 1 over Hillary. of course, we elect people in official polls here. the ballots are just a formality.
well, members of Hillary's staff claiming that they were sexually assaulted by Trump just weeks before the actual election really isn't that surprising. i know that Trump is a disgusting man, but not for what he's said about women. he's entitled to like pretty women, and if they let him touch them and he brags about it, it's not a crime, it's just nasty. what's a crime is the way that even the FBI adjusts to avoid tarnishing Clinton's campaign. we know that she has called black people "super predators" and that she's supported such evil men as Saul Alinsky and Margaret Sanger, people who had nothing but disdain for the poor and downtrodden, but now, she's presented as the candidate who will protect the poor and downtrodden. i'd say 15-20% actually believe the rhetoric, but that should be enough to complete the transaction.
Elections and public speeches/rhetoric are a lot like audio files. Plenty of energy goes into them, some of it is the best honest talent we have to offer. But in the end, convenience wins and we get stuck with low bitrate MP3s and a whole lot of aliasing. But they get played through Macs and iphones and headphones that cost more than a beautiful McIntosh system from any era.
I miss the daily roll out strippers Hillary's lawyers were shopping for.
I can just imagine some gal been dancing all night, snorting and drinking with clients after hours in Jacuzzis.
Gets home 0700 hours and drops.
Then comes the phone call @ 0800 hours saying a car is outside and a check for 5 grand.
Make up artists try to get them ready, wiping all the glitter off, tease thier hair and spray it.
Read the script handed to you.
Call the drug dealer on the way home and square up your debt.
Grab another 8 ball.
Back to work.
