SEQUENCER

[Rebu]

New DAW based on scope dsp

[Neutron]

many functions of a sequencer such as midi processing, file handling and graphics display are better off left on the CPU.

[Rebu]

For now i work with Cubase but i try Reaper and i'm really impressed , Great seq. i think is my next daw

[many functions of a sequencer such as midi processing, file handling and graphics display are better off left on the CPU.]

..maybe, but if i write where Scope need improvment to go to next level i write this:

1- Stability (now i work fine but freeze problem not solved 100%)
2- Internal Seq.
3- Better support

IMO

P.S. maybe it's idea for another post: Write 3 area where you think scope need improvment to go to next level
P.P.S. sorry for English

[dawman]

Gine LBH VIII a look-see here.

http://www.spacef-devices.com/VIDEOS-B/ ... ercent.jpg

[astroman]

there can never be an 'internal' sequencer because DSPs cannot handle file IO and all that stuff.
Btw half of Scope is running on the CPU anyway

cheers, Tom

[Rebu]

In other words:
Also ProTools has 'only' a native sequencer integrated with the DSP cards functions.

I assume thats what was meant

Yes BINGO!! ..but only a dream

[iSiStOy]

I own Cubase SX3: it's lot of work to really get proper hardware integration working into it. Only a small few devices are referenced in Midi machines. For the others you have that are not listed in stock presets, you're up for some painful Sysex programming!
I don't know about Cubase 4 however. I only heard rumours it's no better in 4.0.0 than in SX3.