*** spam ***

digitalaudiosoft · Post by **digitalaudiosoft** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:46 pm

edited because to much spam on this interesting topic.sorry for all who wants to have more knowledge.

digitalaudiosoft · Post by **digitalaudiosoft** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:52 pm

edited because to much spam on this interesting topic.sorry for all who wants to have more knowledge.

AndreD · Post by **AndreD** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 1:18 am

..but it´s fact that jitter http://www.tnt-audio.com/clinica/jitter1_e.html can be perceived even by unprofessionals...
there are audiointerfaces with an industry-chip for worlclock, rme and tc e.g. are using high end controllers with jitter < 1ns.

so a professional worlclock has nothing to do with dropouts or clicks and pops, a professional worlclock CAN change the COLOR of audio signlas

digitalaudiosoft · Post by **digitalaudiosoft** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 2:33 am

edited because to much spam on this interesting topic.sorry for all who wants to have more knowledge.

AndreD · Post by **AndreD** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 2:41 am

sorry but your answer a sounds little arrogant to my ears

digitalaudiosoft · Post by **digitalaudiosoft** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 2:49 am

edited because to much spam on this interesting topic.sorry for all who wants to have more knowledge.

astroman · Post by **astroman** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 2:50 am

digitalaudiosoft wrote:...
i like resellers when they are talking about tech and sound...a creamware resellers can say :a16 works like an apogee....api say's we don't need wordclock because our clock are very good !
...

all would actually be very simple if they'd just provide the type of clock generator and it's tolerances... pants down, so to say
would spare me the screwdriver to open the box and void warranty because I was too curious, again

Eric, your 'story' contributions are much appreciated, it's always fun to read about live events and such stuff - but there is no truth about 'sound' than the listener's own experience. Which is very individual.
Noone questions your qualification in your job, there's no need for personal defense - just accept that others have ears, too.
Some use them this way, some that, others don't care.

cheers, Tom

digitalaudiosoft · Post by **digitalaudiosoft** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 3:13 am

tom,i have accepted lots of things from you and friends,so,instead of writing new polemics here and on wired's post ,in wich ,by mail i have trryed to help him like garyb ,immanuel...
why don't you talk about your true and nice experience on recording live dvd or cd albums like me ?
you write,you are able to dev a sdk,where is it ?
you think you are sound engineer ,where are you working ? for who ? since when ?
you can devellope on visual basic ,me too ...and what else ?
you are better on forum than me ! that's the truth.

my topics is only about my experience with wordclock...if you don't accept this,that's not my problem...
we are on a forum,and i see lots of member coming on every topics and write their own truth...
but, where is the truth ? who is able to talk about someting when it's not his job ?

you are right,you disgust me to write about my job and experience.you have win again.

AndreD · Post by **AndreD** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 3:15 am

Peace and FULLSTOP

astroman · Post by **astroman** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:21 am

fortunately I just had a fine Belmore Small Torpedo... and agree with Andre

cheers, Tom

digitalaudiosoft · Post by **digitalaudiosoft** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:23 am

edited because to much spam on this interesting topic.sorry for all who wants to have more knowledge.

astroman · Post by **astroman** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:21 am

sorry Eric, any sound fragment of that size is an error in itself - before you can start listen, it's already over

disappointed, Tom

digitalaudiosoft · Post by **digitalaudiosoft** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:52 am

astroman wrote:sorry Eric, any sound fragment of that size is an error in itself - before you can start listen, it's already over

disappointed, Tom

so,mr sound forum specialist : what is it ?

when you get,drop out,big cliks due to clock syncro (master/slave) ,that's not the same...how many of you have not understand well how to chain lots of num hard...i'm sure if i made a search,i will find a lot only here ...

about this fragment of that size ...wrong again, a clock error on pro hardware,( maybe in your pocket studio not the same) is only on few sample,and this one appears on this part of the4 mn wave recorded...maybe you haven't ear it...you understand nothing on sound...so,i will let you speak alone,you make me tired...
cheers,eric

Post by **hubird** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:04 am

he just means that the fragment od audio is to small to concentrate on...

Your polish layer of the last days appears to be rather thin uh?
You wasn't even offended, you just think you was, and hopla, there you go again...

digitalaudiosoft · Post by **digitalaudiosoft** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:30 am

hubird wrote:he just means that the fragment od audio is to small to concentrate on...

hubird,

i have understand tom well ,but what you and tom don't understand is that this fragment is very long to be not able to hear what i talk about...

hubird wrote: there you go again...

what about you here my friend ?

cheers,peace,eric

next to nothing · Post by **next to nothing** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:48 am

john lennon sang som nifty tunes!

katano · Post by **katano** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 10:08 am

eric,

is it that small click followed by a wobbling sound starting at the beginning
of "say"? if yes, i've to say sorry to all who don't hear it

I'm listening
with a pair of Quadral pc desktop speakers (less than 150 Euro) and can
even here it!!

cheers
roman

Shroomz~> · Post by **Shroomz~>** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 2:55 pm

...on second thoughts, it's just more of the same...

dawman · Post by **dawman** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:00 pm

Is that Monty Python movie?

Post by **garyb** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:15 pm

it is the french knights taunting the hapless english knights...