PlanetZ forums - scopeusers.com

btw warp69.. is there any chance that TC could deliver their VSS3 (from a techincal point of view) as native plugin? or is it too demanding? (However if they want to is another story). From a technical point of view - easily. It could also run on Scope boards - it would take the same amount of RAM/...

The VSS3 algorithm (TC3000) has a mono in -> stereo out ER engine that have upto 80+ taps depending on the preset. All the demos in the link have added reverberation besides the ER's. The Ambience plugin also have close to 80 taps, but with different values of course. The difference is you can have ...

Fluxpod wrote:Its the only uncracked system; so its understandable that it is used.And its worth having for this plug only.

Seriously.Nothing in scope comes remotly close at the moment.

Ehm well. I still do some prototyping on Scope SDK - so existing and future products does exist in some form in Scope

@dawman Ugh... Kontakt... Info on the web dating from 2004 suggests these plugs were "ported" from the Lexicon equipment, apparently that is not the case. I really like the SC-Plate. Tim The P100 is identical to the PCM91 rich plate algorithm. A100 is identical to the PCM91 ambience algor...

I listen to for example David Guetta's track and in the first few seconds there might be just a bass drum and one synth instrument: a bass, a lead or something between. It sounds incredibly good and full. With just 2 instruments he can fill spectrum of sound goodness that makes my body wanna move t...

(usually the reverbs are extremely transparent) here's Your loft my acid (Fearless Transhouse Mix Long) by Death in Vegas as an example for kind of minimal sound mega-production, featured in an Oreal ad... nice to watch, too :D note 'chain-clicking', cam noise and other environmental 'noises' integ...

Warp69: can there be any differences in outcome due to floating point rounding.. or is the resolution on the float to high to see any impact when comparing cpu with dsp? Yes - you will exprience differences if you don't use the exact same number representation. That's infact the reason why you can'...

Then what are the philosophical differences between DSP's, CPU's and GPU's that have positioned them as specialists for thier given application ? Thier reason for existing, if you like. Or might manufacturers just as well be throwing intel CPU's onto 3D gaming cards and Avid HDX cards (if not now, ...

But due to the O/S of the computer the performance differs with computers vs dsp for the SAME type algorithms latency wise; don't just look at DIVA look at any quality Native synth (Native starts out with higher latency due to buffer-size and it is Cumulative. And when a algorithm is too demmanding...

a comparison between a good native synth such as uhe diva and the minimax, we can see the difference in therms of cpu load and the diva is hungry even on the latest cpu while the minimax runs flawlessly on the sharcs.. You can't compare two different algorithms to measure performance. One with zero...

You can get the same result from CPU's as you can from DSP's and vice versa. You can't measure the quality of algorithms by looking at the latency. LP Splitcomp uses linear phase processing which is not possible in realtime (neither DSP, analogue or what ever) and will introduce latency. It's not th...

So, you think we won´t see these optimizations because of too much effort and too much work necessary ? Bowen have used a lot of resources on the DSP work (better modules and optimization), but if that's transferable to the Scope (SC) system - I don't know. Let us assume for a moment that SC lacks ...

With Cubase 6.5, they have made a giant leap forward. I would not say these can replace the best hardware synthesizers but they are quite useful. Turn off the built-in effects and they still sound good....................... Matthias Klag is behind the new synths in Cubase 6.5 - he's absolutely no ...

oh, so since they have more sales, they obviously have a better product and need no help? going by your logic, McDonalds makes the best food. the best reason is because they want more options and a better product, regardless of sales. i'm freaking tired of companies that place their profits, as imp...

UAD needs to jump on the open-Scope development - but I don't think their ego's will let them. I simply can't think of a single reason why they should? I would imagine UA is projecting sales numbers for the first hour of sales for the Apollo to be equal to the sales numbers for XITE the first 24 mo...

But this Apollo thang is just a Satellite with I/O tacked on and Thunderbolt instead of USB (which is just fixing a mistake) and a boost in pricetag to match isnt it ? I suppose the real game lifter here is that it runs on a PC as well as Mac, while the satellite was Mac only. No. * It's now possib...

I wonder, aside from marketing strategies, if porting some 3rd party UAD plugins like MXR, Ampex, Lexicon, Manley, Neve, Roland, SSL, Studer to the SCOPE Plugin format is technically feasible. Porting may be the wrong approach...maybe re-developing is needed, heavily depending on Scope's SDK All th...

A XITE-1(D) competitor?

http://www.uaudio.com/apollo

I'm bumping this old thread to help give support to SC and our beloved (pending) Scope 6 developers - to help us distinguish between DSP and CPU horsepower in today's systems. Wouldn't it better to bump/create threads on other boards to support SC? There will always be some people that don't like o...

Does this sum it up ? . Open Scope basically liberates Scope from the Project Window. . The only way to do that previously was to use XTC mode and integrate with a sequencer (albeit bound by the model of existing Scope devices). . Now it would be possible for a host developer to write (or modify ex...